George Stewart
1764 - Aft 1815 (> 52 years)
-
Name George Stewart Born 5 Aug 1764 Letter, Callander, Perthshire, Scotland 
Gender Male Died Aft 1815 Person ID I16176 Brown Genealogy Last Modified 19 Sep 2024
Father Robert Stewart, in Gartmore, b. Abt 1732, Edraleachdach, Callander, Perthshire, Scotland , d. Bef 1815 (Age ~ 82 years) Relationship natural Mother Elizabeth McFarlane, b. 3 Jul 1727, Callander, Perthshire, Scotland , d. UNKNOWN Relationship natural Married 24 Mar 1757 Aberfoyle, Perthshire, Scotland Family ID F4685 Group Sheet | Family Chart
-
Notes - Stewarts of the South has made an error in accounting for the children of this family. Robert Stewart in Gartmore is recorded as having two sons named James, but OPR data shows that one of these sons was actually named George. Either the author or transcriber of Stewarts of the South made an error and simply repeated the name James. Onomastics would suggest and OPR data confirms that the eldest was James and the second was George. However we cannot be confident that Stewarts of the South has recorded them in the correct order. So it is probable, but not certain, that the first of these two sons described is that of James and the second is that of George, but we cannot say for sure without further evidence.
1. James (or George) Stewart, [a] cottager [in] Aberfoil [in the] Lordship of Monteith. He has:
two sons with their father
2. James (or George) Stewart, [who is a] householder [in the] village of Gartmore. [He has] three sons: the first is a mason; the second a gardener; the third is a shoemaker.
- Stewarts of the South has made an error in accounting for the children of this family. Robert Stewart in Gartmore is recorded as having two sons named James, but OPR data shows that one of these sons was actually named George. Either the author or transcriber of Stewarts of the South made an error and simply repeated the name James. Onomastics would suggest and OPR data confirms that the eldest was James and the second was George. However we cannot be confident that Stewarts of the South has recorded them in the correct order. So it is probable, but not certain, that the first of these two sons described is that of James and the second is that of George, but we cannot say for sure without further evidence.